Hi Alexander! On Mon, 14 May 2012 22:43:12 +0200, Alexander Golovko wrote: > On Mon, 14 May 2012 14:48:25 +0200, Luca Capello wrote: >> On Thu, 10 May 2012 00:06:25 +0200, Alexander Golovko wrote: >>> Fortunally, there are SHA1 implementation in openssl library. >>> Used functions have the same names and arguments and bacula already >>> linked with libssl >>> >>> We need only change headers, makefile.in and remove bad files. >> >> Thank you, forwarded upstream to: >> >> <http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1869> >> > > I'm afraid, this patch can't be merged into upstream without changes, > because bacula can be built without SSL support, but with SHA1. > But it will be greate if we will not need to support it always.
For the time being (the upstream BTS shows some discussion) I will simply apply your patch and "forget" that we can build Bacula without SSL support but with SHA-1, given that Debian does not provide such packages. > Ok, i add it into master branch > <http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-bacula/bacula.git;a=commitdiff;h=6c562cfdaffd730c796518233f0d97da08a3891b> While the patch is perfectly fine, we should completely remove the two offending files from the upstream sources as well. Unfortunately, the DFSG-free .orig.tar.gz Kefu uploaded still contains them: <http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/bacula/news/20120430T091734Z.html> I am going to upload a fixed package this weekend. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
pgpmkLcDYfWkr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
