Quoting Colin Watson (cjwat...@ubuntu.com): > > I'd recommend, in libnss-winbind: > > Breaks: libpam-winbind (<< 2:3.6.5-2) > Replaces: libpam-winbind (<< 2:3.6.5-2)
Oh, right. That was indeed forgotten when I "created" the new package by copy/paste in debian/control. /me bashes self for not properly checking. Thanks for pointing! I'm building a new package right now and will hopefully upload it, hoping that it's not REJECTed with some cryptic message from dak....just as it happened for attempts I made two days ago. > > (Also, I don't see why you didn't just make libpam-winbind depend on > libnss-winbind. #646292 requests the ability to install the NSS modules > without the PAM modules, but not vice versa. So why not just make the > PAM module package require the NSS module package, and then everything > would just work on upgrade and you wouldn't need the NEWS.Debian hack?) Well, how about Recommends? I suspect some people might find use cases for the PAM module without the NSS modules though none come actually to my mind. --
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
