Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:39:01 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334603: Linking problem with amd64 port (not able to run
32bit SW, not finding /lib/ld-linux.so.2)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2005 21:51:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 18 14:51:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from static-195-068.catv.glattnet.ch (ikki) [80.242.195.68]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERzMl-00040u-00; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:51:27 -0700
Received: from vanda ([192.168.17.5])
by ikki with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
id 1ERzMe-0005NT-Qp; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 23:51:20 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linking problem with amd64 port (not able to run 32bit SW,
not finding /lib/ld-linux.so.2)
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 01:51:19 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.5-6
Severity: critical
Tags: testing
I just updated from AMD64 port of sarge to AMD64 port of etch. Now no
32bit application can be stared anymore.
ldd gives the following error:
/usr/bin/ldd: line 171: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht
gefunden
ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exited with unknown exit code (127)
Maybe this is a result of the patch noticed in 325226 but I'm not sure.
In fact ther is no ld-linux.so.2.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (800, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-11-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to
de_DE)
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 334603-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Oct 2005 07:39:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 19 00:39:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from static-195-068.catv.glattnet.ch (ikki) [80.242.195.68]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ES8XU-0006kP-00; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:39:08 -0700
Received: from klaus by ikki with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1ES8XN-0004PU-QC; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:39:01 +0200
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:39:01 +0200
From: Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#334603: Linking problem with amd64 port (not able to run 32bit
SW, not finding /lib/ld-linux.so.2)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Am Mi den 19. Okt 2005 um 0:06 schrieb Daniel Jacobowitz:
> libc6 doesn't provide 32 bit libraries on amd64 (yet). Do you have
> ia32-libs installed? Maybe your upgrade removed it.
Yes, that was it. Strange that this package is not essential on the
platform. However, then the bug is closed for me or at least not
critical anymore.
Regards
Klaus Ethgen
- --
Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.de/
pub 2048R/D1A4EDE5 2000-02-26 Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fingerprint: D7 67 71 C4 99 A6 D4 FE EA 40 30 57 3C 88 26 2B
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBQ1X4FZ+OKpjRpO3lAQK+Hgf/UKwB8bwzC52dYFCpCLyfuXaZ602CTvpo
rSKSRj9YgkIvLyhsLkjsfCmrXKvGDS+WKwVq0ao4tsBMeeCJ831D6c4N+6BZtyBj
wt9ri4T2QoAKjYqcNCNAPUm6rSh5D3Q+5dyHsFJy4jFvlXaq23GwrePizrQSwzVX
bNll6OibcMKRlcheMUBPk5p3i4K7m/Pa750dDsBSNUUw9T0apyN4KY82dWIOdiGg
kw4+oFRe1au6PFx0N1Irp2dPlTMKDVxfsKJkZ8ngkGCryvamueIW9RKClw+gcKOI
LIlbHWhOuRIXGMfQhpf1m9V/l8pGEYRlQ4SpTy/BTZRnTlWbIrthVA==
=x4bA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
