On 04/20/2012 06:45 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:03:45PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> Source: c3p0 >> Version: 0.9.1.2-5 >> Severity: serious >> Tags: wheezy sid >> User: debian...@lists.debian.org >> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120419 qa-ftbfs >> Justification: FTBFS on amd64 >> >> Hi, >> >> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on >> amd64. >> > > Hi, > > I can't reproduce this in a current pbuilder sid chroot. I agree this > package could use some love since its build is full of warnings and > whatnot but it is not FTBFS on me. Am I missing something? > > I'm not tagging this as unreproducible until somebody else from the team > can confirm it.
I have built the package 4 times now in clean wheezy and sid chroots on amd64, and experienced 1 failure out of 4 (same exception as the one Lucas reported, but for a different source file). Perhaps the issue is not with c3p0 but with gcj-jdk. In the meantime, I am in the midst of updating the package for some of the other outstanding bugs and issues. Thank you, tony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
