On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 06:21:39PM +0400, jaa...@ro.ru wrote: > I've got access to the relevant system earlier than expected. Here > is the reportbug report. As soon as libreoffice 3.5.x enters > testing, I'll try it out and report here. [...] > * What led up to the situation? Update of libreoffice.
No, it didn't. This is a upgrade of ... > * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or > ineffective)? Running aptitude, selecting a bunch of upgradable > packages (what exactly can be seen below), asking to upgrade them. ... "a bunch of upgradable packages". I actually don't believe that you installed *all* upgradable packages (or you had a interesting mix before so that -common etc are not needed to be upgaded. So it doesn't even make sense to try and debootstrap a snapshot and try a upgrade (and fwiw, 3.4.6-2 is in testing since 2 weeks...) I am actually not sure this is *ever* reproducable unless we know the exact state before. > Versions of packages libreoffice-writer2xhtml depends on: > ii gcj-4.6-jre [java5-runtime] 4.6.3-1 > ii gcj-jre [java5-runtime] 4:4.6.2-4 And gcj is unreliable... See e.g. http://bugs.debian.org/470397. It might just also be that writer2latex doesn't work with gcj. Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
