On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:14:58 +0100, Javi Merino wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:21:00AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 13:27:03 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote: > > > > > Your package failed to build on the kfreebsd-amd64 buildds: > > > > > > --- > > > /build/buildd-mercurial_2.1.2-2-kfreebsd-amd64-aq2Wfm/mercurial-2.1.2/tests/test-symlink-placeholder.t > > > +++ > > > /build/buildd-mercurial_2.1.2-2-kfreebsd-amd64-aq2Wfm/mercurial-2.1.2/tests/test-symlink-placeholder.t.err > > > @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ > > > $ rm b > > > $ echo foo > b > > > $ hg --config extensions.n=$TESTTMP/nolink.py status --debug > > > - ignoring suspect symlink placeholder "b" > > > > > > Make a clone using placeholders: > > > > > > > > > ERROR: > > > /build/buildd-mercurial_2.1.2-2-kfreebsd-amd64-aq2Wfm/mercurial-2.1.2/tests/test-symlink-placeholder.t > > > output changed > > > > > Out of 4 tries on kfreebsd-amd64 for this version, it failed 3 times on > > 3 different tests, and succeeded on the fourth build. Not sure I > > understand this particular one, but I think it's more likely to be an > > unreliable test than a new bug. > > None of the changes from 2.1.2-1 to 2.1.2-2 should affect these tests, so > that's actually 2 successful builds out of 5. On some architectures the > testsuite is unreliable. If this happens again, I'll probably stop > running it on kfreebsd-amd64. > FWIW, same failure at http://hgbuildbot.kublai.com/builders/OS%20X%2010.6%20hg%20tests/builds/106/steps/run-tests.py%20%28python2.7%29/logs/stdio I don't think it's an architecture issue.
Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
