On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:22:21AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:25:01PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 03:27:47PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > This looks like a repeat of bug #628237. However, slapd 2.4.28-1.1/amd64 > > has a dependency on libsasl2-2 (>= 2.1.24), but your bug report shows:
> No, it does not. > | Depends: [...] libsasl2-2, [...] Oh, sorry, I was looking at 2.4.28-1.2 by mistake, which is /only/ built on amd64 (because it was FTBFS when the NMUer uploaded it). So this is still bug #628237, and it'll be shaken out once openldap is next uploaded (i.e., once we fix the build failure). -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
