On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 03:49:13PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 07:16:04AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 02:19:31PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:30:24AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 02:49:08PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > > > > > This looks fine to me, I don't know much about debian though. If you > > > > > feel confident in it I'm fine with merging it. Otherwise someone else > > > > > should look at it. > > > > > > > > I am happy with this change. > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au> > > > > > > Thank you. I pushed this to master. > > > > > > Simon, I haven't backported this or the previous series of Debian > > > changes to 1.4. Do you want me to do that? > > > > How far away do you think 1.5 is? > > Personally, I think that if its more than a few weeks away then I think > > that fixing up the Debian packaging in 1.4 would be worthwhile. > > I'll do the backport. > > I'm not sure whether Debian should upgrade to 1.5 when it comes out > anyway. OVS 1.4 is a branch that we are planning to support for an > extended period of time. If wheezy freezes in June, then 1.4 will be > the last such release before the freeze.
Understood, in that case I agree that backporting makes sense. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
