On ven., 2012-03-09 at 21:42 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: > [ I'm sending this to the two bugs Rhonda sent the mail I reply to and > an additional bug tagged wontfix to avoid spamming all affected bugs ]
Can't this be helpful to others? > > * Gerfried Fuchs [2011-10-13 15:12 +0200]: > > it seems that the line 161 is actually a tar.bz2 file that gets > > extracted and then used. Though, first there is some substitution of \r > > and \n characters so that the "file" could go on one line. > > > > IMHO this is not acceptable because there are no tools included or > > commandline switches offered with waf (in postler and midori) to > > conveniently unpack and repack these part for a.) inspection or b.) > > modification, which are required for packages in Debian main. > > Exactly regenerating tarballs is, similar to regenerating man pages that > contain a date, possible but not that easy. Ignoring this non-relevant > difference of regenerated tarballs, I was able to regenerate an exact > copy of the waf script: > > $ rm -rf midori-0.4.3 > $ dpkg-source -x midori_0.4.3-1.dsc >/dev/null 2>&1 > $ cd midori-0.4.3 > $ sed < waf -e '1,/^#==>$/ d' -e '/^#<==$/ d' | tr -d '\n' | sed -e 's/.//' > -e 's/#[*]/\n/g' -e 's/#%/\r/g' > waf.orig.tar.bz2 > $ tar tjf waf.orig.tar.bz2 > wafadmin/Logs.py > wafadmin/Constants.py > wafadmin/py3kfixes.py > ... > $ (sed -n < waf -e '1,/^#==>$/ p'; echo REPLACED BY ENCODED TAR.BZ2; sed -n > < waf -e '/^#<==$/ p') > debian/waf.tmpl > $ wc -c debian/waf.tmpl > 4097 debian/waf.tmpl > $ (sed -n < debian/waf.tmpl -e '1,/^#==>$/ p'; printf '#'; perl -pe < > waf.orig.tar.bz2 's/\n/#*/g; s/\r/#%/g;'; echo; sed -n < debian/waf.tmpl -e > '/^#<==$/ p') > waf.regen > $ md5sum waf waf.regen > eca3f4738d809c42cecad2e9ec39a1cc waf > eca3f4738d809c42cecad2e9ec39a1cc waf.regen > > I assume that it should be possible to develop a DFSG conforming > solution based on above hack. The requirements to sed extend POSIX's > specifications, but given that it could be replaced with perl and we use > GNU sed in Debian this shouldn't be a problem. > I have to admit I'm not exactly sure what your point is. From where does the waf command you're using come from? Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
