On 12-03-08 at 01:35pm, Michael Biebl wrote: > On 08.03.2012 13:08, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > On 12-03-08 at 12:14pm, Michael Biebl wrote: > > >> While I don't agree that /usr/lib is a good default for $libexecdir > >> the change in debhelper/dh was at least done by only setting this > >> new behaviour when bumping the compat level which is an explicit > >> action by the package maintainer. > > > > Please elaborate - or help point me to where that dispute is > > clarified.
[details snipped] Thanks for the details. As mentioned before I am already convinced, but this nevertheless was enlightening. Thanks again! > It looks more sensible to me, if cdbs-using packages that need a new > automake resp pkglibexecdir set libexecdir explicitly to something > like /usr/lib. > > That said, if you think this needs further discussion, feel free to > raise this topic on debian-devel. I think I have a decent understanding now, and will try first discuss at the bugreport only - but will consult d-devel@d.o if needed. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
