On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Nicholas Bamber <nicho...@periapt.co.uk> wrote: > Samuel, > I am sorry you had issues with w3c-sgml-lib. I put the package together > because what went before (w3c-dtd-xhtml) could not be kept up with the > w3C which I saw as the upstream. Some things I did in the package wee an > attempt at backwards compatibility. However I am now busy with quite a > few other things and I reckon you know how this stuff works better than > I do. So I would really appreciate it if you were able to offer a patch.
Well, the simplest remedy for *this* problem would be to remove/comment out both lines in debian/sgmlcatalog, e.g. using the appended patch, but in poking around a bit, I ran into several other problems: First of all, there certainly *are* a bunch of broken symlinks: http://lintian.debian.org/full/debian-xml-sgml-p...@lists.alioth.debian.org.html#w3c-sgml-lib has a list of these. Second, it installs copies of/links to the top-level "catalog.xml" (and the translation to SGML Open Catalog format, "catalog") in subdirectories (in the name of "compatability") which, like the copies of sgml.soc and xml.soc presently installed in /usr/share/sgml/xhtml/, reference other files using relative paths and are thus broken by being relocated separately from them. Third, it installs all of the upstream files under /usr/share/xml/xhtml/schema/dtd/, even though: * The name of the package is "w3c-sgml-lib", which leads one to expect things to be installed under /usr/share/sgml. * Several of the directories actually concern SGML-based versions of HTML, and would seem more at home somewhere like /usr/share/sgml/html/ * There are also a few directories devoted to things like MathML and SVG, which, while they are XML applications, still aren't XHTML and so still seem out of place where they are. Now, there *are* some good reasons to install this way: * Upstream's catalog files (catalog.xml, sgml.soc, and xml.soc) cater to this layout. * They could probably be split between /usr/share/sgml and /usr/share/xml, but it would be a pain to keep track of what went where, make sure that everything got installed somewhere, and perhaps also to get w3c-markup-validator to look in both places. So, considering all of this, and the fact that you don't include all of the same DTDs as w3c-dtd-xhtml, I would recommend that you relocate everything to /usr/share/sgml/w3c-sgml-lib, (perhaps symlinked from /usr/share/xml/w3c-sgml-lib ?), drop the Provides:/Conflicts: on w3c-dtd-xhtml, declare a Breaks: on existing versions of w3c-markup-validator, and upload a new version of the validator that requires the new version of w3c-sgml-lib. The justifications for this path being: * XML is a kind of SGML, but not the other way 'round, so if we're going to install everything in one place, the SGML place is the better of the two. * Since there is no one format [family] to name the directory after, we go with the traditional rule "just use the package name". Anyway, here's the patch to fix the immediate problem I encountered: Index: debian/sgmlcatalogs =================================================================== --- debian/sgmlcatalogs (revision 1916) +++ debian/sgmlcatalogs (working copy) @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ -htdocs/sgml-lib/sgml.soc /usr/share/sgml/xhtml/sgml.soc -htdocs/sgml-lib/xml.soc /usr/share/sgml/xhtml/xml.soc +# There may be useful stuff in these, but they also set some +# non-working default SGML declarations, so we can't safely add them +# to the system-wide /etc/sgml/catalog. +# htdocs/sgml-lib/sgml.soc /usr/share/sgml/xhtml/sgml.soc +# htdocs/sgml-lib/xml.soc /usr/share/sgml/xhtml/xml.soc + Index: debian/changelog =================================================================== --- debian/changelog (revision 1916) +++ debian/changelog (working copy) @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +w3c-sgml-lib (1.2-2~naesten1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Don't link sgml.soc and xml.soc into /etc/sgml/catalog -- they are + specially crafted for use with w3c-markup-validator, and set things + that shouldn't be set globally. + * Also don't install sgml.soc and xml.soc into /etc/sgml/xhtml/ -- they + don't work there anyway, since they refer to many other files by + relative paths, none of which are found there. + + -- Samuel Bronson <naes...@gmail.com> Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:13:13 -0500 + w3c-sgml-lib (1.2-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org