On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Ralf Treinen <trei...@free.fr> wrote:
> Hello, > > On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:22:19PM -0500, Christopher L Conway wrote: > > Not sure how to handle this. On the C++ side, the policy dictates a > > libcvc3-X package with libcvc3.so.X and a libcvc3-X-dev package with > > libcvc3.so -> libfoo.so.X. On the Java side, we don't have any > headers to > > install, so a libcvc3-X-jni-dev package seems like overkill just for a > > libcvc3jni.so symlink. > > I have no idea about java packaging. Did you check what the debian Java > policy says ? (not sure whether there is one, but at least there should > exist such a policy :-) > The Debian policy for Java on JNI packages ( http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/x145.html) provides no real guidance on this question akin to Debian Policy Sections 8.1 and 8.5. -Chris
