Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2012 20:59:29 +0800
with message-id <4f48db31.1010...@rolf.leggewie.biz>
and subject line Re: Bug#661231: isdnlog: unowned files after purge (policy
6.8) violating FHS (policy 9.1) too
has caused the Debian Bug report #661231,
regarding isdnlog: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8) violating FHS (policy
9.1) too
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
661231: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661231
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: isdnlog
Version: 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.3-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m21.9s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system:
/isdn.conf not owned
/rate.conf not owned
As putting files directly into / is also a violation of
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.1.2
I'm setting the severity to serious.
cheers,
Andreas
isdnlog_1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.3-4.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 25.02.2012 20:04, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
> the system after purge
Thank you Andreas, for your reports, but this one is known and already
reported as bug 331116. Please try to avoid duplicate reports.
Furthermore, automated tests are of limited value at this point in
time. I'm very well aware that the package is (still) in terrible
shape, the bug above is being worked on and has the "Help" tag set.
There is no need to make me aware via automated testing of what I
already know. Actually, it keeps me busy with unproductive tasks.
Thank you for your consideration.
--- End Message ---
