Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:48:22 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2005 00:20:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 13 17:20:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DsrTA-0005V8-00; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:20:53 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253])
        (authenticated bits=0)
        by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6E0JclX049814
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
        (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Dsj2B-0000uG-HR
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 08:20:27 -0700
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 08:20:27 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: Incompatible with new dpkg-dev
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on 
zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,
        HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: regex
Version: 0.12-15.1
Severity: serious

The package fails to build from source because it is incompatible with
recent versions of dpkg-dev:

>  debian/rules build
> dpkg: unknown option --print-gnu-build-architecture
>=20
> Type dpkg --help for help about installing and deinstalling packages [*];
> Use `dselect' or `aptitude' for user-friendly package management;
> Type dpkg -Dhelp for a list of dpkg debug flag values;
> Type dpkg --force-help for a list of forcing options;
> Type dpkg-deb --help for help about manipulating *.deb files;
> Type dpkg --licence for copyright licence and lack of warranty (GNU GPL) =
[*].
>=20
> Options marked [*] produce a lot of output - pipe it through `less' or `m=
ore' !
> dh_testdir
> CONFIG_SITE=3D"" CC=3D-linuxlibc1-gcc ./configure
> creating cache ./config.cache
> checking for gcc... -linuxlibc1-gcc
> checking whether the C compiler (-linuxlibc1-gcc  ) works... no
> configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler canno=
t create executables.
> make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1

More information about the new dpkg-dev can be found at

 http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00010.html

--=20
Matt

--oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC1TE7fNdgYxVXvBARAgabAJwIuaRmi5goy8GAff88iqCY3KPESgCfSBJs
PpxR7FQvVcqFO7K1bgCZAhg=
=ocke
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 318198-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Oct 2005 14:48:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 12 07:48:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from crumbs.ertius.org [67.18.176.136] (postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EPhuN-0003Lx-00; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 07:48:43 -0700
Received: from ooder.ertius.org (unknown [10.10.0.1])
        by crumbs.ertius.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E18B70392
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:48:43 +1000 (EST)
Received: by ooder.ertius.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id B3BA077B1B; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:48:22 +1000 (EST)
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:48:22 +1000
From: Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: removed from Debian
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Closing this bug because the package has been removed from Debian
(http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/regex.html).

-rob


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to