Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:50:44 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333479: gdk-imlib1: gdk-imblib1 should not explicitly
conflict with libpng2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Oct 2005 06:27:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 11 23:27:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ppp244-36.lns2.adl2.internode.on.net (hank.shelbyville.oz)
[203.122.244.36]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EPa4x-0003QX-00; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:27:08 -0700
Received: from ron by hank.shelbyville.oz with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EPa1G-00023X-CB; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:53:18 +0930
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gdk-imlib1: gdk-imblib1 should not explicitly conflict with libpng2
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:53:18 +0930
X-Debbugs-Cc: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: gdk-imlib1
Version: 1.9.14-22
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Hi,
Unless there is something big I am missing, gdk-imlib should
certainly not take it upon itself to force the removal of
libpng2 and all its dependencies...
Josselin: I see from #323354 that you are planning to kill
off libpng2 soon in any case. Where does this leave apps
that still depend on gtk1? Will it be rebuilt to use png3,
or something else? wx2.4 can build with png3 just fine,
but I'm much less sure about how well it can be rebuilt with
gtk2...
That's not the only package that this (wrong IMO) change to
gdk-imlib make uninstallable on my system though. Please
fix this and/or advise of a transition plan.
thanks,
Ron
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages gdk-imlib1 depends on:
ii imlib-base 1.9.14-21 Common files needed by the Imlib/G
ii libc6 2.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-10 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-18 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii libjpeg62 6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG
ii libpng10-0 1.0.18-1 PNG library, older version - runti
ii libtiff4 3.7.4-1 Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii libungif4g 4.1.3-3 shared library for GIF images (run
ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii libxi6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8 X Window System Input extension li
ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8 X Window System client libraries m
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime
gdk-imlib1 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 333479-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Oct 2005 06:50:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 11 23:50:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EPaRo-00016O-00; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:50:44 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EPaRo-0002D1-6r; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:50:44 -0700
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#333479: gdk-imlib1: gdk-imblib1 should not explicitly conflict
with libpng2
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Zippy-Says: If I am elected no one will ever have to do their laundry again!
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:50:44 -0700
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]'s message
of "Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:53:18 +0930")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: gdk-imlib1
> Version: 1.9.14-22
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> Unless there is something big I am missing, gdk-imlib should
> certainly not take it upon itself to force the removal of
> libpng2 and all its dependencies...
There is something big you are missing.
libpng2 is being removed from Debian. libpng12-0 is a suitable
replacement, source and binary compatible.
Old versions of gdk-imlib1 were linked against libpng2 (or libpng10-0,
which amount to the same thing). The new version of gdk-imlib1 is a
masquerade; it's really gdk-imlib11. Packages expecting gdk-imlib1
will work fine getting gdk-imlib11 instead, except for those that
independently link against libpng10-0 (or libpng2). Those will
encounter disasters, because both png's cannot be loaded into one
program simultaneously without problems.
So it was either recompile everything that uses gdk-imlib1, or
recompile everything that uses libpng2/libpng10-0. But the latter is
*already necessary*, because libpng2 is being removed from Debian.
Unstable is... unstable!
Packages that use libpng2 or libpng10-0 should be recompiled.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
