Assuming it's the fully correct path, it looks reasonable to me.
--Justin
On Feb 13, 2012, at 4:15 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> DKMS passes in an explicit variable for the kernel source directory, so we
> should use that instead of `uname -r`.
>
> CC: 659...@bugs.debian.org
> Reported-by: Thomas Goirand <tho...@goirand.fr>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
> ---
> debian/dkms.conf.in | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/debian/dkms.conf.in b/debian/dkms.conf.in
> index ae1fc7a..d5bc37e 100644
> --- a/debian/dkms.conf.in
> +++ b/debian/dkms.conf.in
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> PACKAGE_NAME="openvswitch"
> PACKAGE_VERSION="__VERSION__"
> -MAKE="./configure --with-linux=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build && make -C
> datapath/linux"
> +MAKE="./configure --with-linux='${kernel_source_dir}' && make -C
> datapath/linux"
> BUILT_MODULE_NAME[0]=openvswitch_mod
> BUILT_MODULE_NAME[1]=brcompat_mod
> BUILT_MODULE_LOCATION[0]=datapath/linux/
> --
> 1.7.2.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> d...@openvswitch.org
> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
