Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:18:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333380: udev: loads possibly broken framebuffer device
driver
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Oct 2005 17:02:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 11 10:02:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sakura.malsain.org (arrakis.localnet) [82.241.136.161]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EPNWh-0003j2-00; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:02:55 -0700
Received: from joss by arrakis.localnet with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EPNWB-0001Ta-4M; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:02:23 +0200
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:02:22 +0200
From: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: udev: loads possibly broken framebuffer device driver
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: udev
Version: 0.070-3
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
When installing udev 0.070-3, it loaded the radeonfb module upon reboot.
The result was immediate: blank screen, system unusable. For some
reason, this module doesn't work on my system (not so rare, a Radeon
7500). As this kind of problem isn't uncommon (after all, there is a
reason why the kernel isn't booted in framebuffer mode by default), you
shouldn't try to load framebuffer drivers. For example they could be
blacklisted.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages udev depends on:
ii hotplug 0.0.20040329-25 Linux Hotplug Scripts
ii initscripts 2.86.ds1-4 Standard scripts needed for bootin
ii libc6 2.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libselinux1 1.26-1 SELinux shared libraries
ii lsb-base 3.0-9 Linux Standard Base 3.0 init scrip
ii makedev 2.3.1-78 creates device files in /dev
ii sed 4.1.4-4 The GNU sed stream editor
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 333380-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Oct 2005 17:18:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 11 10:18:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from attila.bofh.it [213.92.8.2]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EPNm7-0002wK-00; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:18:51 -0700
Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 2E66C5F85A; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:18:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 822761C60F; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:18:42 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:18:42 +0200
To: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#333380: udev: loads possibly broken framebuffer device driver
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Please upgrade.
--=20
ciao,
Marco
--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDS/PyFGfw2OHuP7ERAs6aAKCZUOwmqDxS4CP9Cc7ItzQaAVJiMQCfbMbk
sEvEPIvM5M2U0oFmme2jxUk=
=ZkzH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
