Your message dated Mon, 9 Jan 2012 03:29:20 -0600
with message-id <20120109092920.GA19613@burratino>
and subject line Re: hashcash: Should this package be removed?
has caused the Debian Bug report #653532,
regarding Should this package be removed?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
653532: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653532
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: hashcash
Severity: serious
hashcash is unchanged since etch and has marginal popcon. The entire
concept of hashcash has never really kicked off. Should this package
be removed?
Cheers,
Moritz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hubert Chathi wrote:
> I, personally, would prefer to keep it of course, but would not protest
> too loudly if it were removed.
Seems like a sane package with a responsive maintainer, which is all
that is needed for a package to be kept. Closing.
Of course a simple update to make whatever changes (if any) are
appropriate and bump standards-version would probably be welcome.
--- End Message ---
