Hey,

* Alexander Reichle-Schmehl <toli...@debian.org> [2011-12-03 16:29:00 CET]:
> I've prepared an NMU for qcake (versioned as 0.7.2-2.1). The diff
> is attached to this message.

 Actually, what sense does an NMU make if the other RC for qcake is
still there?  If you want to NMU, then please fix both, or none,
half-baken solutions sound fishy to me.

 Additionally, I also like to question why this approach was taken and
ncurses was disabled?  There seems to be a feature that linking ncurses
in does offer which through this approach would get disabled.

 Thirdly, did you take a look at the VCS that is noted down in
debian/control?  Because actually, I added libnucrses-dev to the
Build-Depends to fix this issue.  I really would love to see people
working on bugs to check the VCS of the package if what they would like
to NMU might not already be addressed in there...  That shouldn't be
asked too much.

  But as mentioned at the start, I don't think it makes much sense to
fix this one and ignore the other FTBFS bug.  That's not very helpful,
IMHO.  I really would love to see a solution for the other bug, or have
an arch specific RM request done if that's what is wanted to "solve"
that bug.

 Enjoy,
Rhonda
-- 
Fühlst du dich mutlos, fass endlich Mut, los      |
Fühlst du dich hilflos, geh raus und hilf, los    | Wir sind Helden
Fühlst du dich machtlos, geh raus und mach, los   | 23.55: Alles auf Anfang
Fühlst du dich haltlos, such Halt und lass los    |



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to