Your message dated Thu, 1 Dec 2011 02:57:25 +0100
with message-id <20111201015725.ga22...@bongo.bofh.it>
and subject line Re: Bug#650556: udev: upgrade removes locally modified conffile
has caused the Debian Bug report #650556,
regarding udev: upgrade removes locally modified conffile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
650556: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650556
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: udev
Version: 175-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3
Dear Maintainer,
after upgrading udev to 175-2 the file /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf is gone,
even though it has been locally modified.
The latest bit of aptitude log is:
===============================================================================
[INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] libffi5
[UPGRADE] libglib2.0-0 2.28.8-1 -> 2.30.2-4
[UPGRADE] libglib2.0-data 2.28.8-1 -> 2.30.2-4
[UPGRADE] libudev0 172-1 -> 175-2
[UPGRADE] udev 172-1 -> 175-2
===============================================================================
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages udev depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.41
ii libc6 2.13-21
ii libselinux1 2.1.0-4
ii libudev0 175-2
ii lsb-base 3.2-28
ii util-linux 2.19.1-5
Versions of packages udev recommends:
ii pciutils 1:3.1.7-12
ii usbutils 1:004-2
udev suggests no packages.
-- debconf information:
udev/new_kernel_needed: false
udev/title/upgrade:
udev/reboot_needed:
udev/sysfs_deprecated_incompatibility:
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Dec 01, Ian Zimmerman <i...@buug.org> wrote:
> Marco> Was it renamed or what else?
> Yes, I think it was renamed to one of those *.dpkg-* names.
So it is working as designed:
http://www.dpkg.org/dpkg/ConffileHandling
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
