Hi Gio, Dear mipsel porters, Am Mittwoch, den 23.11.2011, 17:01 +0100 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani: > On 22/11/2011 23:20, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 18.11.2011, 14:10 +0100 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani: > >> I just asked to install build dependencies on eder to do tests on > >> mipsel. > > > > any news from this front? > > Yes: the package builds without errors. As usual, I don't know what to > do in this situation. Moreover, today another build was attempted and it > failed, but with a different error. > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=haskell-xss-sanitize&arch=mipsel&ver=0.3.0.1-1 > > Apparently rem and mayer have the same CPU, but mayer has more memory > than rem. On the other side, eder (the porterbox I used for my > compilation) has 1G RAM as mayer, and I'm not able to compare the CPUs > (they appear to be quite different inside, even if theoretically they > should behave the same). > > During the compilation on eder, I noticed that the cc1 process used > about 80% of the memory, which leads me to thinking that it was also > using heavily the swap.
the rebuild today was scheduled by me – after we identified memory to be the culprit on armel, I thought it was worth a try. Maybe here the problem is slightly a different one. Dear mipesel porters, you know your boxes better: What could lead to a successful build on eder, but failed builds on both mayer and rem? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
