Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:49:28 +0000
with message-id <e1rstjq-0003tv...@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#643635: fixed in metapixel 1.0.2-7.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #643635,
regarding metapixel: Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not libjpeg62-dev
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
643635: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643635
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: metapixel
Version: 1.0.2-7
Severity: important

Hello Chris,

We are transitionning from libjpeg62 to libjpeg8.
As mentionned on debian-devel-announce[1], please update metapixel to
Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev instead of libjpeg62-dev.

The following Build-Depends was found:

metapixel       :Build-Depends: libjpeg62-dev | libjpeg-dev libjpeg62-dev | 
libjpeg-dev

Please change it to
Build-Depends: libjpeg-dev
so it is build against the latest jpeg version.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2010/02/msg00006.html

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <ballo...@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: metapixel
Source-Version: 1.0.2-7.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
metapixel, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

metapixel_1.0.2-7.1.diff.gz
  to main/m/metapixel/metapixel_1.0.2-7.1.diff.gz
metapixel_1.0.2-7.1.dsc
  to main/m/metapixel/metapixel_1.0.2-7.1.dsc
metapixel_1.0.2-7.1_amd64.deb
  to main/m/metapixel/metapixel_1.0.2-7.1_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 643...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Didier Raboud <o...@debian.org> (supplier of updated metapixel package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:44:46 +0100
Source: metapixel
Binary: metapixel
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.2-7.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chris Vanden Berghe <chris...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Didier Raboud <o...@debian.org>
Description: 
 metapixel  - generator for photomosaics
Closes: 643635
Changes: 
 metapixel (1.0.2-7.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not libjpeg62-dev (Closes: #643635)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 e97dd101aad6430ed2b0520bee8757969440d879 1570 metapixel_1.0.2-7.1.dsc
 763d0566d3464994d2e1a28856052286a10c9305 15336 metapixel_1.0.2-7.1.diff.gz
 96be4a6052591be108f9dd3ad221d0881c4e542b 55170 metapixel_1.0.2-7.1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 e9e2092fdde9cddd3076d0408f89004756060a201f3fb01287e19d775be07544 1570 
metapixel_1.0.2-7.1.dsc
 2e0ee31f09515ca2a4dfeb83f1809c52d9127ffb92f6f7eea081b7478b74e078 15336 
metapixel_1.0.2-7.1.diff.gz
 807617adf3bf9ae9e7def0af08983d938cdf1f104fe0c219ba9c3f9ae6fdb37f 55170 
metapixel_1.0.2-7.1_amd64.deb
Files: 
 06236430983349bc177e7fc72baa7578 1570 graphics optional metapixel_1.0.2-7.1.dsc
 0f18b77cc070fac55dd2b8d6c668ce52 15336 graphics optional 
metapixel_1.0.2-7.1.diff.gz
 64075d37747de51e9484bc09da454527 55170 graphics optional 
metapixel_1.0.2-7.1_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=/RvQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---

Reply via email to