Your message dated Sun, 6 Nov 2011 17:30:59 +0100
with message-id <20111106163059.ga18...@belanna.comodo.priv.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#625412: tuxpuck: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror
has caused the Debian Bug report #625412,
regarding tuxpuck: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
625412: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625412
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tuxpuck
Version: 0.8.2-2.1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.6 ftbfs-werror
This package builds with -Werror, and GCC 4.6 triggers new warnings
which will make the package fail to build. Currently a Debian patch
just passes
-Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable and
-Wno-error=unused-but-set-parameter
to avoid build failures, but this patch will be reverted with the
GCC 4.6.1 release, and the severity of the report will be raised.
The full build log can be found at:
http://people.debian.org/~doko/tmp/werror/tuxpuck_0.8.2-2.1_lsid64.buildlog
The last lines of the build log are at the end of this report.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 00:30:26 +0100, peter green wrote:
> tags 625412 +patch
Not really ;)
> Doko's report is a false positive. The files that generate the
> warnings in question are not built using -Werror.
Ack, closing this bug.
> However while testing to confirm that it was a false positive I
> discovered that tuxpuck was unbuildable in current sid for another
> reason. tuxpuck build-depends on both libjpeg62-dev and
> libsdl1.2-dev. Since libsdl1.2-dev now depends on libjpeg8-dev this
> renders the build dependencies uninstallable. The fix is to change
> the libjpeg62-dev build-dependency to libjpeg8-dev.
Yup, that's (also) #634637.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key ID: 0x8649AA06
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
`. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
`- NP: The Mamas & The Papas: Dancing In The Street
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
