Hi, > > There is absolutely *no* relation between unattended-upgrades and > > pm-utils. Any process running at the time of hibernation could consider > > itself just as important as unattended-upgrades, thereby preventing the
> I'm open for better suggestions but it seems preferable to delay > hibernation than to potentially break the system. The package manager is a rather essential part of the system and trying to keep it running without interrupting seems indeed the wise thing to do. Other than long running user processes, terminating may actually prevent the system from coming back up again. The submitter is right that you should carefully weigh which applications should be stopping hibernation from happening, but this is a case that definately sides on "yes" for me. I propose to close this bug. -- Thijs Kinkhorst <th...@uvt.nl> – LIS Unix Universiteit van Tilburg – Library and IT Services • Postbus 90153, 5000 LE Bezoekadres > Warandelaan 2 • Tel. 013 466 3035 • G 236 • http://www.uvt.nl
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
