On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 15:54:40 -0700, Chuan-kai Lin wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Phil Brooke <p...@debian.org> wrote: > > My intent after the last release was to suggest that the yiff packages are > > removed from the archive. It's not needed in any other packages, IIRC. I'll > > try to check that soon. > > > > But it means that the bison version can be retained without fuss. > > My bad -- should have checked for package name conflict before > introducing liby-dev as part of bison multi-arch support. Let me know > if I should upload a new bison version without liby-dev. > It would probably make sense to pick a different name, yes.
Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
