Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#330637: fixed in bzip2 1.0.2-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 01:06:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 18:06:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 83-216-156-21.jamest747.adsl.metronet.co.uk 
(pasta.gloaming.local) [83.216.156.21] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EKmse-0007wP-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:06:36 -0700
Received: from james by pasta.gloaming.local with local (Exim 4.52 #1 (Debian))
        id 1EKms8-0002lR-4g
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:06:04 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libbz2-1.0: broken .shlibs file
Mail-Copies-To: never
From: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:06:04 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libbz2-1.0
Version: 1.0.2-9
Severity: serious

While building gnupg, I noticed the following:

| dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: unable to find dependency information for shared 
library libbz2 (soname 1.0, path /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1.0, dependency field 
Depends)

...

| % cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libbz2-1.0.shlibs 
| libbz2  1       libbz2-1.0

The soname is '1.0' not '1'.

-- 
James

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 330637-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 03:48:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 20:48:12 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EKpNz-00065T-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:47:07 -0700
From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#330637: fixed in bzip2 1.0.2-10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:47:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: bzip2
Source-Version: 1.0.2-10

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
bzip2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

bzip2_1.0.2-10.diff.gz
  to pool/main/b/bzip2/bzip2_1.0.2-10.diff.gz
bzip2_1.0.2-10.dsc
  to pool/main/b/bzip2/bzip2_1.0.2-10.dsc
bzip2_1.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/b/bzip2/bzip2_1.0.2-10_i386.deb
bzip2_1.0.2-10_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/b/bzip2/bzip2_1.0.2-10_sparc.deb
libbz2-1.0_1.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/b/bzip2/libbz2-1.0_1.0.2-10_i386.deb
libbz2-1.0_1.0.2-10_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/b/bzip2/libbz2-1.0_1.0.2-10_sparc.deb
libbz2-dev_1.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/b/bzip2/libbz2-dev_1.0.2-10_i386.deb
libbz2-dev_1.0.2-10_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/b/bzip2/libbz2-dev_1.0.2-10_sparc.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated bzip2 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:04:47 +1000
Source: bzip2
Binary: libbz2-1.0 bzip2 libbz2-dev
Architecture: source i386 sparc
Version: 1.0.2-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 bzip2      - high-quality block-sorting file compressor - utilities
 libbz2-1.0 - high-quality block-sorting file compressor library - runtime
 libbz2-dev - high-quality block-sorting file compressor library - development
Closes: 330637
Changes: 
 bzip2 (1.0.2-10) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fixed "libbz2-1.0: broken .shlibs file", closes: #330637.
Files: 
 a96db662b28369e1817b3c38ddb93fd5 637 utils important bzip2_1.0.2-10.dsc
 927414f26bd4795f1a3b11555ab524ac 16618 utils important bzip2_1.0.2-10.diff.gz
 891e92f5312bd2a4d83d71b31d7ca4e2 42152 libs important 
libbz2-1.0_1.0.2-10_i386.deb
 ab9eee45203f2cd3ea41195cf8340310 32624 libdevel optional 
libbz2-dev_1.0.2-10_i386.deb
 e9cf920515e10956e4f7b90d8ad7d228 233528 utils optional bzip2_1.0.2-10_i386.deb
 71aef691b8cbb2f7ea9e34c243c65555 39590 libs important 
libbz2-1.0_1.0.2-10_sparc.deb
 826832349be3aacaa9fe9dcdb2e9a6d2 32094 libdevel optional 
libbz2-dev_1.0.2-10_sparc.deb
 6629eb98ca678eb246593e25b808b4a4 234396 utils optional bzip2_1.0.2-10_sparc.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDO1/HgY5NIXPNpFURAlNZAKCAkqBom5DvaQyol1W6s6qSneeRjwCdE0NU
lIK0FcHf4Gf27QbYdAUqS9M=
=lWjM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to