On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 16:57 +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 08:26:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Any chance of debdiffs for stable and oldstable so we can look at > > possibly getting this resolved in the next point release? (For which > > the NEW queue will be frozen during the weekend of October 1st). > > For stable it would be > http://pinky.die-welt.net/~evgeni/v86d_0.1.9→10-1.diff > (with changing the version to 0.1.10-0squeeze1?)
Thanks. As mentioned on IRC, I'd prefer a diff that didn't involve moving the "now upstream" patches in to the source, and dropping the patches; it makes the diff noisier and less "obvious" than would be ideal for stable. In terms of the other fixes, #525415 might be okay. What's the intent of * Add manual_add_modules uvesafb to the initramfs-hook (thanks Ubuntu!) ? > For oldstable I did not produce any debdiff, as I dont think anyone is > using v86d there, but I could apply the only-CVE patch on the package. That would be good; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
