Jérémie Koenig <j...@jk.fr.eu.org> writes: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Philipp Kern <pk...@debian.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:40:05PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: >>> Hurd violates the FHS by using /libexec. This name seems to be only used >>> by init and /etc/ttys. >> >> I'm upgrading this to serious on the grounds that this package is only >> useful on the non-release architecture hurd-i386 and it's clearly a >> policy violation that makes the package unsuitable for a release. > > There's a patch here: http://lists.archhurd.org/devel/msg00102.html. > > The patch moves /libexec/* to /etc. I guess /sbin (or maybe, > /lib/hurd) would be more appropriate. What do you think?
With my "occassional Hurd user" hat on, /lib/hurd sounds like the most appropriate place to put these stuff into, or failing that, /sbin. But definitely not /etc. Neither init, nor console-run strike me as things the user would wish to edit. -- |8] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
