On 09/05/2011 10:42 PM, Jon Dowland wrote:
i never used git.debian.org in the first place.
So you didn't. So instead I should have written:
You forgot (or haven't got around to) pushing back to
git.debian-maintainers.org…
However, http://git.debian-maintainers.org/?p=daniel/vsftpd.git is now a 404.
first of all..
i used to use git.debian.net as git.debian.org is unusable (for
starters, it's not using a ssh gatekeeper). people accused me abusing
debian ressources (sic; it's a debian.net domain name!). so i switched
over the course of two years all my packages to
git.debian-maintainers.org. when i was finished, people accused me,
amonst others, of hiding maintainer ship by, amonst others, using
non-alioth infrastructure.
what i learned from this? never ever use any domain matching
(.*)debian(.*) anymore for anything (live.d.n being the only exception)
and not referencing vcs in control anymore anywhere...
I see in the changelog:
* Removing vcs fields.
Not helpful ☹
...and guess what? you people keep complaining.
in order to further minimize that, next time, i will just tag bugs
pending without mentioning git or version control or anything like that.
second, the repo on git.d-m.o was outdated since quite some time, i just
forgot to remove it, which i did today after uploading the new one to
the new location. i soon can get rid of the whole domain anyway once all
my packages have been moved.
third, in debian[tm], maintainers are free to use whatever version
control they seem fit, or none at all. so from your point of view, i see
no point in being any better of as if i would not use any version
control at all.
not amused.
--
Address: Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
