Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:27:01 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328075: fixed in tagcoll 1.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 09:47:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 02:47:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from frigg.ftbfs.de [212.112.246.221]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF7NZ-000525-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:47:06 -0700
Received: from localhost (localimap [192.168.2.3])
by frigg.ftbfs.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E311779275
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:47:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from frigg.ftbfs.de ([192.168.2.3])
by localhost (frigg.ftbfs.de [192.168.2.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 00468-03 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:46:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from laptop.zobel.private.ftbfs.de (drm9-d9bb2c32.pool.mediaWays.net
[217.187.44.50])
by frigg.ftbfs.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD7E785CF
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:46:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by laptop.zobel.private.ftbfs.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 51E04A03533; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:46:54 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:46:54 +0200
From: Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tagcoll: FTBFS on mips/experimental
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-ftbfs-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at frigg.ftbfs.de (config: 0.1a)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: tagcoll
Version: 1.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: experimental
Copied from the build-log:
> make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/tagcoll-1.4/tagcoll/tagexpr'
> Making all in .
> make[4]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/tagcoll-1.4/tagcoll'
> if /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.
> -I.. -I.. -DCOMPILE_TESTSUITE -g -Wall -O2 -Wall -MT stringf.lo -MD -MP
> -MF ".deps/stringf.Tpo" -c -o stringf.lo stringf.cc; \
> then mv -f ".deps/stringf.Tpo" ".deps/stringf.Plo"; else rm -f
> ".deps/stringf.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -DCOMPILE_TESTSUITE -g -Wall -O2 -Wall
> -MT stringf.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/stringf.Tpo -c stringf.cc -o stringf.o
> if /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.
> -I.. -I.. -DCOMPILE_TESTSUITE -g -Wall -O2 -Wall -MT OpSet.lo -MD -MP -MF
> ".deps/OpSet.Tpo" -c -o OpSet.lo OpSet.cc; \
> then mv -f ".deps/OpSet.Tpo" ".deps/OpSet.Plo"; else rm -f ".deps/OpSet.Tpo";
> exit 1; fi
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -DCOMPILE_TESTSUITE -g -Wall -O2 -Wall
> -MT OpSet.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/OpSet.Tpo -c OpSet.cc -o OpSet.o
> In file included from OpSet.cc:167:
> ../tests/test-utils.h:6:17: error: tut.h: No such file or directory
> ../tests/test-utils.h:36: error: expected namespace-name before ';' token
> ../tests/test-utils.h:36: error: '<type error>' is not a namespace
> ../tests/test-utils.h: In function 'void
> tut_tagcoll::__test_tagged_collection(std::string, int,
> Tagcoll::Collection<std::string, std::string>&)':
> ../tests/test-utils.h:92: error: 'ensure' was not declared in this scope
> OpSet.cc: At global scope:
> OpSet.cc:174: error: expected initializer before '<' token
> OpSet.cc:174: error: 'tg' has not been declared
> OpSet.cc:174: error: 'object' does not name a type
> OpSet.cc:174: error: 'tg' does not name a type
> OpSet.cc:177: error: 'to' has not been declared
> OpSet.cc:177: error: expected initializer before '<' token
> make[4]: *** [OpSet.lo] Error 1
> make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/tagcoll-1.4/tagcoll'
> make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/tagcoll-1.4/tagcoll'
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/tagcoll-1.4'
> make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/tagcoll-1.4'
> make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2
Full build-log is availible on
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?&pkg=tagcoll&ver=1.4-1&arch=mips&stamp=1126429713&file=log&as=raw
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 328075-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Sep 2005 22:38:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 27 15:38:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EKNuf-0006Hb-00; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:27:01 -0700
From: Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#328075: fixed in tagcoll 1.5-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:27:01 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: tagcoll
Source-Version: 1.5-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tagcoll, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libtagcoll-dev_1.5-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/t/tagcoll/libtagcoll-dev_1.5-1_i386.deb
tagcoll_1.5-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/tagcoll/tagcoll_1.5-1.diff.gz
tagcoll_1.5-1.dsc
to pool/main/t/tagcoll/tagcoll_1.5-1.dsc
tagcoll_1.5-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/t/tagcoll/tagcoll_1.5-1_i386.deb
tagcoll_1.5.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/tagcoll/tagcoll_1.5.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated tagcoll package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 16:57:42 +0200
Source: tagcoll
Binary: libtagcoll-dev tagcoll
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
libtagcoll-dev - Functions used to manipulate tagged collections (development
vers
tagcoll - Commandline tool to perform operations on tagged collections
Closes: 328075
Changes:
tagcoll (1.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream version
* API changed. All reverse build-depends are aware of it.
* Build-dep on tut-dev and tdb-dev. Closes: #328075
Files:
4a9f2de411e95c62585fdc71b2dd87ca 689 libdevel optional tagcoll_1.5-1.dsc
4571958074d2b45461da16df071d5073 777386 libdevel optional
tagcoll_1.5.orig.tar.gz
3cb772d0cece13e541f53099bb167103 20 libdevel optional tagcoll_1.5-1.diff.gz
0f4cadfe28ae1e19193e3dbcbd01ad0e 425592 misc optional tagcoll_1.5-1_i386.deb
7ce2abb9703bea66de3d61bbb27c443a 1736172 libdevel optional
libtagcoll-dev_1.5-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDNnN79LSwzHl+v6sRAqnyAJ0RlKKOSf4+zwr3US6zzi2VNWO/uACfdSEy
JneDA7PwIvnPIenRMg251s8=
=mC2V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
