severity 638595 important thanks On 2011-08-21 jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > rename 638595 HTTPS now unusable > reassign 638595 libgnutls26 > found 638595 2.12.7-6 > severity 638595 critical > thanks > >>>>> "A" == Andrew M Bishop <a...@gedanken.demon.co.uk> writes: > A> I am having the problems as well now (I hadn't realised it until you > A> pointed it out) and I haven't changed my version of WWWOFFLE for a > A> long time but gnutls has changed recently. > A> Everything that I can see points to gnutls in Debian (Wheezy at least) > A> as being the cause of these problems with WWWOFFLE.
Quoting http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer.en.html#severities: ----------------------- critical makes unrelated software on the system (or the whole system) break, or causes serious data loss, or introduces a security hole on systems where you install the package. grave makes the package in question unusable or mostly so, or causes data loss, or introduces a security hole allowing access to the accounts of users who use the package. serious is a severe violation of Debian policy (roughly, it violates a "must" or "required" directive), or, in the package maintainer's or release manager's opinion, makes the package unsuitable for release. ------------------------ This definitely is not a critical bug. wwwoffle links against gnutls, it is not "unrelated software". It is not a security hole either. Downgrading to non-release critical status at least for the time being, since this should not block propagation of 2.12.7-7 (which definitly does fix a rc-bug) to testing. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
