On 17 August 2011 10:53, Thorsten Glaser <t...@mirbsd.de> wrote: > Riku Voipio dixit: > >>btw I don't think failing nocheck is RC. > > Failing nocheck _is_ RC, actually. (§4.9.1)
You mean the section starting with: Supporting the standardized environment variable DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS is *recommended* ;) That said the section should be amended with something akin "If these environment variables are supported in package, the must work". >>please check next time if the ftbfs is caused by nocheck before >>filing a the bug. This would help maintainers trace and fix the bug faster. > In this case, the maintainer could be faster, due to the > timezone difference ;-) It’s not like I don’t try to help > tracking down bugs, but I just came home at past midnight… This case yes, but the general case that debian has many more people reporting bugs than fixing bugs means we really need the best possible bugreports. Riku -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
