Christian Hammers wrote: > (first, what means "UTFC" in the subject?)
Use The **** Changelog. > mysql-dfsg-4.1 was affected and needs a DSA. Would it be correct if I > close the bug in unstable also the bug is still present in stable? > (I could have used "found" tags though). Just use Closes: in the chanbgelog. Belive it or not, the BTS will do the right thing. See recent posts to debian-devel-announce. > > Which it wasn't btw, the latest version of mysql-dfsg in the archive was > > released this May. > > The unstable version has had build problems for the last months on some > archs (and I was on holyday when the bug was found). Currently I try to > get someone from the s390 team to install me the build-deps in a dchroot > but [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to go to /dev/null :-( > > Anyway I'm working on s390 for unstable/testing and waiting for Martin > Schulze to get the DSA out. I do not understand why you are waiting to upload a fix just because s390 doesn't build. mysql-dfsg 4.0.24-10 is still vulnerable in unstable for all architectures. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
