Your message dated Sun, 25 Sep 2005 07:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329929: fixed in gucharmap 1:1.4.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 14:21:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 07:21:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from s2.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org) [217.158.120.143]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EJAuM-0000wD-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 07:21:42 -0700
Received: from hardknott.home.whinlatter.ukfsn.org
(dsl-88-104-36-139.access.as9105.com [88.104.36.139])
by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 1CFE1E6F17; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 15:18:56 +0100 (BST)
Received: from rleigh by hardknott.home.whinlatter.ukfsn.org with local (Exim
4.52)
id 1EJAr9-0004A3-NJ; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 15:18:23 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gucharmap: postinst blows away system immodules configuration
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 15:18:23 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: gucharmap
Version: 1:1.4.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Replaces conffile from another package, wiping any customisation
The postinst contains this line:
# Hopefully GTK+ upstream will do something about this sillyness
gtk-query-immodules-2.0 > /etc/gtk-2.0/gtk.immodules
This is rather rude. Wiping out a conffile from another package is
not nice.
Why is gucharmap doing this? It's no different from any other GTK+
application WRT immodules, and certainly has no business doing this.
Regards,
Roger
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.1
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages gucharmap depends on:
ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii libbonobo2-0 2.10.1-1 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii libbonoboui2-0 2.10.1-1 The Bonobo UI library
ii libc6 2.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgconf2-4 2.10.1-5 GNOME configuration database syste
ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.0-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgnome2-0 2.10.1-1 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file
ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.10.2-2 A powerful object-oriented display
ii libgnomeui-0 2.10.1-1 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf
ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.10.1-5 The GNOME virtual file-system libr
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.10-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface
ii libgtk2.0-bin 2.6.10-1 The programs for the GTK+ graphica
ii libgucharmap4 1:1.4.3-2 Unicode browser widget library (sh
ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii liborbit2 1:2.12.2-3 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii libpango1.0-0 1.10.0-2 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii libsm6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System Session Management
ii libxml2 2.6.22-1 GNOME XML library
ii scrollkeeper 0.3.14-10 A free electronic cataloging syste
ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System client libraries m
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime
gucharmap recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 329929-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Sep 2005 14:38:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 25 07:38:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EJXXx-0004qC-00; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 07:32:05 -0700
From: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#329929: fixed in gucharmap 1:1.4.4-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 07:32:05 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: gucharmap
Source-Version: 1:1.4.4-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gucharmap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
gucharmap_1.4.4-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gucharmap/gucharmap_1.4.4-1.diff.gz
gucharmap_1.4.4-1.dsc
to pool/main/g/gucharmap/gucharmap_1.4.4-1.dsc
gucharmap_1.4.4-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gucharmap/gucharmap_1.4.4-1_i386.deb
gucharmap_1.4.4.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/gucharmap/gucharmap_1.4.4.orig.tar.gz
libgucharmap4-dev_1.4.4-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gucharmap/libgucharmap4-dev_1.4.4-1_i386.deb
libgucharmap4_1.4.4-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gucharmap/libgucharmap4_1.4.4-1_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gucharmap package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:57:35 +0200
Source: gucharmap
Binary: libgucharmap4 libgucharmap4-dev gucharmap
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.4.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
gucharmap - Unicode character picker and font browser
libgucharmap4 - Unicode browser widget library (shared library)
libgucharmap4-dev - Unicode browser widget library (development headers)
Closes: 329929
Changes:
gucharmap (1:1.4.4-1) unstable; urgency=high
.
[ Jordi Mallach ]
* debian/control.in: move libgucharmap4-dev to section libdevel.
.
[ Loic Minier ]
* New upstream release.
- Build-depend on gnome-doc-utils >= 0.3.2.
[debian/control, debian/control.in]
* Remove probably obsolete gtk-query-immodules-2.0 call from postinst.
(Closes: #329929) [debian/gucharmap.postinst]
* Disable scrollkeeper updates at make install time via configure.
[debian/rules]
* Clarify copyright/license. [debian/copyright]
* Update upstream URL. [debian/copyright]
* Bump up Standards-Version to 3.6.2. [debian/control, debian/control.in]
* Add CDBS' utils. [debian/rules]
Files:
ed3337e8b2e62e06690ba4e3324e46ec 1746 x11 optional gucharmap_1.4.4-1.dsc
b3d937839b3510c7bc95a8663a976133 2088796 x11 optional
gucharmap_1.4.4.orig.tar.gz
dfada1da7f95d0ae6e99b644c20800a8 4756 x11 optional gucharmap_1.4.4-1.diff.gz
bd3dfa553714609bc44e6fa35cc20cf3 1035992 libs optional
libgucharmap4_1.4.4-1_i386.deb
140da58af6531c1a4c7c658c66096fca 585518 x11 optional gucharmap_1.4.4-1_i386.deb
12bf91d4ed7b72030af446bf59aea1f5 25830 libdevel optional
libgucharmap4-dev_1.4.4-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDNq5E4VUX8isJIMARAiTpAJ0XmP/1FKWQv7a1fWlwxPm3dw1MXQCgpK1Z
H9ao6/zaML8VF907EMX9+xE=
=1TEC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
