On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 11:24:31PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 09:27:22PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > > > The last "fic" opcode entry is wrong. It's using the wrong > > > instruction format, the mask is wrong, pa10 is wrong, etc. > > > > I don't think we realised this until now. I suspect we've been > > silently emitting bad code up until this point, and given that it's > > in flush_kernel_icache_page, maybe it explains some of our occasional > > crashes. > > > > The code was previously: > > > > fic,m %r23(%r26) > > I've committed a fix to binutils head. The above should now be > accepted when generating PA 2.0 code. However, I'd probably > avoid using this feature for awhile. It looks like the bug has > been present since ~ 1996.
This is in a file that's used on pa1.1 processors too, so I've gone with specifying sr4 explicitly. Thanks for fixing this bug and exposing our bug ... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
