On 29 June 2011 at 15:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
| Hi,
|
| > Your package is uninstallable on some archs:
| >
| > mrbayes-mpi/mips unsatisfiable Depends: openmpi-bin
| > mrbayes-mpi/mipsel unsatisfiable Depends: openmpi-bin
| > mrbayes-mpi/s390 unsatisfiable Depends: openmpi-bin
|
| I admit I'm not so comfortable with these architectures. Is there any
| drop-in replacement for openmpi on these and if yes, what do I need to
| specify in debian/{control,rules}?
There is. We are simply slow in implementing this for all packages.
[ Long and boring story: MPICH was never in Debian, LAM deprecated, OpenMPI
undermaintained. I adopted it a few years ago; Manuel then took over. Open
MPI _upstream_ never had support for certain arches (for performance / ASM
use reasons) so we always had these 'holess'. ]
The situation is mostly fixed and automatic now. Instead of depending on
openmpi, just depend in mpi-default-dev and everything should just work (TM).
| Could any other package with the same problem serve as an example?
Here is what my pgapack package does:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0), mpi-default-dev
and here is my Rmpi package (which also needs R):
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.0), cdbs, r-base-dev (>= 2.12.0),
mpi-default-dev
Hope this helps, Dirk
| Kind regards
|
| Andreas.
|
| --
| http://fam-tille.de
|
|
| --
| To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
| with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
| Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110629130159.ga13...@an3as.eu
|
--
Gauss once played himself in a zero-sum game and won $50.
-- #11 at http://www.gaussfacts.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
