On May 13, Matthias Dellweg <2...@gmx.de> wrote: > Summing this up I think it is a timing problem. It seems to me that the udevd > from initramfs is in fact killed, but nobody waits for it to actually die. This is true, so it looks like that nowadays udevd is slower to die. This could be a symptom of udevadm settle not working correctly, which I think is an interesting theory due to #624010.
I need better code for extra/initramfs.bottom, but I am not sure about what is available to initramfs scripts. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
