Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2011 10:25:49 +0100
with message-id <4dccf91d.5000...@p10link.net>
and subject line hivex now seems to have been built successfully on all
architectures.
has caused the Debian Bug report #589809,
regarding hivex FTBFS on buildds.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
589809: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589809
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: hivex
Version: 1.2.2+git20100712-2
Severity: important
According to https://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=hivex&dist=unstable the
autobuilders built hivex successfully on i386 and have tried and failed to build it
on all architectures except i386 and amd64 (they did not build it on amd64 since
you uploaded an amd64 binary).
Different architectures failed in different ways.
alpha, armel, hppa, ia64, mips, mipsel, s390, :
Making all in ocaml
make[4]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd-hivex_1.2.2+git20100712-2-alpha-Lfj9P3/hivex-1.2.2+git20100712/ocaml'
gcc -std=gnu99 -I.. -I/usr/lib/ocaml -I../ocaml -I../lib -g -O2 -fPIC -Wall
-c hivex_c.c
hivex_c.c:52: error: static declaration of 'caml_raise_with_args' follows
non-static declaration
/usr/lib/ocaml/caml/fail.h:30: note: previous declaration of
'caml_raise_with_args' was here
make[4]: *** [hivex_c.o] Error 1
hurd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386:
make[5]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd-hivex_1.2.2+git20100712-2-hurd-i386-QRDg6f/hivex-1.2.2+git20100712/lib'
CC libhivex_la-hivex.lo
/bin/bash ../libtool --silent --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../gnulib/lib -g -O2 -c -o libhivex_la-hivex.lo
`test -f 'hivex.c' || echo './'`hivex.c
hivex.c: In function 'hivex_root':
hivex.c:558: error: 'ENOKEY' undeclared (first use in this function)
hivex.c:558: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
hivex.c:558: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[5]: *** [libhivex_la-hivex.lo] Error 1
powerpc, sparc:
make check-TESTS
make[3]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd-hivex_1.2.2+git20100712-2-powerpc-0hLpXj/hivex-1.2.2+git20100712/ocaml'
PASS: t/hivex_005_load
PASS: t/hivex_010_open
PASS: t/hivex_020_root
01 non-existent file
02 closed handle
03 write to read-only file
04 node_get_child node not found
PASS: t/hivex_100_errors
PASS: t/hivex_110_gc_handle
PASS: t/hivex_200_write
Fatal error: exception Hivex.Error("node_values", 9, "Bad address")
FAIL: t/hivex_300_fold
make[3]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2
===================
1 of 7 tests failed
===================
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd-hivex_1.2.2+git20100712-2-powerpc-0hLpXj/hivex-1.2.2+git20100712/ocaml'
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd-hivex_1.2.2+git20100712-2-powerpc-0hLpXj/hivex-1.2.2+git20100712/ocaml'
make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
Filed as important since the package has never built on those architectures
before but it is strongly preffered by debian that packages are buildable on
all release architectures unless there is a very good reason they can't be.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
version: 1.2.6-3
hivex now seems to have been built successfully on all architectures.
--- End Message ---
