On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:31:39PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 09:43:55AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 12:38:42PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > > > Package: libipc-sharelite-perl > > > Version: 0.17-1 > > > Severity: serious > > > Tags: wheezy sid > > > User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org > > > Usertags: perl-5.12-transition > > > > > > This package failed to build on armel only against Perl 5.12. > > > > > > > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libipc-sharelite-perl&arch=armel&ver=0.17-1%2Bb1&stamp=1304522076 > > > > > Haven't investigated whether this is a regression with Perl 5.12 or > > > something else. The last time it was built on armel was in March 2009. > > > > I can reproduce this on abel.debian.org with both squeeze (Perl 5.10) > > and sid (5.12), but not on agricola.debian.org at all. Either kernel or > > hardware specific? I see from the build log that arnold.debian.org (the > > buildd) is running "Linux 2.6.32 armel (armv5tel)" which matches abel.
> I asked the release team to schedule it again, and it also failed > on ancina.debian.org and alwyn.debian.org, so it's apparently not > an uncommon failure on this arch. Too bad. It's starting to look like a kernel regression from 2.6.26 to me. Maybe we should postpone this, and solve the immediate Perl 5.12 testing migration problem with a a porter binary upload built on agricola.debian.org (but leave this bug open as RC of course.) There are quite a few reverse dependencies via libcache-cache-perl so removal from wheezy doesn't seem a good option at this point. -- Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
