tag 328990 +pending
thanks.

On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:50:37AM +0200, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> * Ron [Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:56:26 +0930]:
>   Yep. Only, I was worried about this m68k trouble taking too long to
>   get solved. It's been a while already, and until this very morning I
>   had not heard there was true progress on it. But it seems it'll be
>   solved RSN.

Yeah, it has caused other bogosity too (since wx2.6 slipped into testing
having never built on that arch before), but appears to be a known
problem.

> > Please feel free to reassign it if you agree that is the case.
> > Otherwise, someone will need to convince me that this does not have
> > an adverse affect on all the other platforms.  (ergo convince me
> > that _I_ should not reassign it ;-)
> 
>   I'd personally just leave it open here until wxwindows2.4 gets rebuilt
>   on m68k, but your call.

Ok.  It is jammed out of testing until it does in any case, so for
now I'll mark it pending (meaning I'll take no further action to
resolve it from here, in anticipation of it being fixed) -- though
for the very same reason, we could probably just close it now too.

It presumably isn't going to tell the m68k porters anything they don't
know to forward it, is it telling wx users much they need to know for
more than the next 28 days?

Thanks,
Ron




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to