Hi, On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:56:52AM +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote: > * Matej Vela [Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200]: > > Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or > > should we wait until someone adopts it? > > #289417 and #280588 are not going to happen because last time I > checked, nobody was volunteer to continue maintaining cabot > _upstream-wise_. Considering the fact that cabot was never part of > testing *and* that a significant part of upstream thinks something > along the line of "Oh well, caff is part of the signing-party package > and is good enough/better than cabot anyway so why bother" so my > opinion is that letting cabot in etch as-is is a bad idea. > > cabot needs someone that's interested in upstream development before > we let it go in etch. Merely adopting the debian package is not enough > for our users.
Qingning, you expressed an interest in adopting cabot. Is this still the case? Would you like to take over upstream maintenance as well? Thanks, Matej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
