Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328205: fixed in octave-gpc 0.1.5-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 05:25:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 22:25:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp1.stanford.edu [171.67.16.123]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFPle-00064S-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:25:10 -0700
Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.19.147])
by smtp1.Stanford.EDU (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8E5P9hg026006
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:25:09 -0700
Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 953D4E7955; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: octave-gpc: rebuild required for hdf5 transition
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:25:09 -0700
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: octave-gpc
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
The current octave-gpc package depends on hdf5 1.6.2, which has been
replaced with hdf5 1.6.4. This package needs to be rebuilt to pick up
the current libraries so that hdf5 can migrate into testing. No source
changes should be required, just a rebuild against the current
packages in unstable.
Please try to do this soon, as the hdf (and lam and mpich) transition
has gotten rather complex. Thank you!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.30
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 328205-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 07:38:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 00:38:13 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EHG8E-0004gk-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:32:06 -0700
From: Debian Octave Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#328205: fixed in octave-gpc 0.1.5-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:32:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: octave-gpc
Source-Version: 0.1.5-5
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
octave-gpc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
octave-gpc_0.1.5-5.diff.gz
to pool/contrib/o/octave-gpc/octave-gpc_0.1.5-5.diff.gz
octave-gpc_0.1.5-5.dsc
to pool/contrib/o/octave-gpc/octave-gpc_0.1.5-5.dsc
octave-gpc_0.1.5-5_i386.deb
to pool/contrib/o/octave-gpc/octave-gpc_0.1.5-5_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Debian Octave Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated octave-gpc package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 09:04:04 +0200
Source: octave-gpc
Binary: octave-gpc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.5-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Octave Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Debian Octave Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
octave-gpc - Octave binding for the General Polygon Clipper Library
Closes: 328205
Changes:
octave-gpc (0.1.5-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
+++ Changes by Rafael Laboissiere
.
* Rebuilt against Octave 2.1.71, for which the API version is api-v13.
The binary dependency on hdf5 is correct now (closes: #328205).
* debian/control: Upgraded Standards-Version to 3.6.2 (no changes
needed)
* debian/copyright: Fixed FSF address
* debian/compat: Added file with compatibility level set to 4
* debian/rules:
+ Removed obsolete definition of DH_COMPAT
+ Removed template stuff left by dh-make
+ Changed isntallation directory from debian/tmp to debian/octave-gpc,
as used in debhelper compatibility level 4
Files:
5ff06895e7c592bcd45a3b88f520b05f 640 contrib/math optional
octave-gpc_0.1.5-5.dsc
1ddfa2fb7934d199e56d090bd26647d6 3552 contrib/math optional
octave-gpc_0.1.5-5.diff.gz
1267221b59118388103c5636cce5dbad 265688 contrib/math optional
octave-gpc_0.1.5-5_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDLmV9k3oga0pdcv4RAg0mAJ0d4lMLEHGU/yR0PXvqdLkVbW/eVwCcCwyv
koZT9YKzmyj+9kMzRp18H6E=
=IQVX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
