Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 16:02:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326499: fixed in gnat-gdb 5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Sep 2005 18:43:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 03 11:43:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from guri.is.scarlet.be [193.74.71.22]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBcyy-0005dY-00; Sat, 03 Sep 2005 11:43:16 -0700
Received: from (ip-83-134-240-44.dsl.scarlet.be [83.134.240.44])
by guri.is.scarlet.be with ESMTP id j83IhEd32220
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sat, 3 Sep 2005 20:43:14 +0200
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 20:43:14 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gnat-gdb: FTBFS on mipsel: ../../../../sim/mips/interp.c:2326: error:
invalid lvalue in assignment
X-Debbugs-CC: Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: gnat-gdb
Version: 5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-9
Severity: serious
Tags: help
gnat-gdb FTBFS on mipsel; see the buildd log. The error message is:
../../../../sim/mips/interp.c: In function 'mips_core_signal':
../../../../sim/mips/interp.c:2326: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
../../../../sim/mips/interp.c:2334: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
I suspect that this is due to the transition to gcc-4.0 as the default
compiler.
Since gnat is not supported on mipsel anyway, I'm considering removing
support for mipsel from gnat-gdb, unless someone interested suggests a
patch.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 326499-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2005 23:10:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 17 16:10:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EGlhG-0008LX-00; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 16:02:14 -0700
From: Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#326499: fixed in gnat-gdb 5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 16:02:14 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: gnat-gdb
Source-Version: 5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-10
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnat-gdb, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
gnat-gdb-doc_5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-10_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gnat-gdb/gnat-gdb-doc_5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-10_all.deb
gnat-gdb_5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-10.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gnat-gdb/gnat-gdb_5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-10.diff.gz
gnat-gdb_5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-10.dsc
to pool/main/g/gnat-gdb/gnat-gdb_5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-10.dsc
gnat-gdb_5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-10_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gnat-gdb/gnat-gdb_5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-10_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gnat-gdb package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 20:40:45 +0200
Source: gnat-gdb
Binary: gnat-gdb gnat-gdb-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
gnat-gdb - Ada-aware version of GDB
gnat-gdb-doc - Documentation for the Ada-aware version of GDB
Closes: 326497 326499 326667
Changes:
gnat-gdb (5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-10) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Frank Lichtenheld contributed several fixes:
- debian/326497.patch: new. Fix FTBFS with gcc-4.0 on alpha.
- debian/326499.patch: new. Fix FTBFS with gcc-4.0 on mips and mipsel.
- Closes: #326497, #326499.
.
* He also reported a future FTBFS:
- debian/control: do not use architecture qualifiers in the Recommends
field; use variable ${recommended:gnat} instead.
- debian/rules: fill the variable depending on the target platform.
- Closes: #326667.
.
* debian/control: build-depend on gettext.
Files:
2b16d6fef8fb510d41b8a06faf60d95b 730 devel optional
gnat-gdb_5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-10.dsc
ebf3efd0cbbf77d64398ded78cc2832e 13518 devel optional
gnat-gdb_5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-10.diff.gz
9b05c35db4dffefd2ed1b693303c11ca 1070364 devel optional
gnat-gdb_5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-10_i386.deb
801514619363bc36a06b72084fb60f25 849418 doc optional
gnat-gdb-doc_5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-10_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDLJ0aStlRaw+TLJwRAmtmAKDBzEf9VmngXTp11SkO4IiGRoDMwACfTL5k
KLPzrIDodg5b7LcMrXATMrk=
=7xH5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
