On 2011-04-01 09:52, Sergei Golovan wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Michael Gebetsroither <mich...@mgeb.org> > wrote: >> On 2011-04-01 09:20, Sergei Golovan wrote:
>>> I don't think so. If it's so important, I'll create a backport of >>> R14B02 and put it into backports.debian.org. >> >> But the real problem is that the version from debian Squeeze >> is _unusable_ as it has multiple exploits in core parts and multiple >> silent data corruption bugs. > > At least I didn't see these bugs myself. So as you don't use e.g RC4 you leave all users open to a known data corruption. Is this really ok? >> Including R14B02 in squeeze-backports would be a good start to >> see which erlang software from squeeze has problems with R14B02 >> and as a strongly encouraged version to use for most users. > > I don't expect many problems with R14B02. Then why not just upload it through squeeze-security and include it in the next squeeze stable version 6.0.2? michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
