Dear Ralf, thanks for pointing these out. In the general case, old and new -doc packages should thankfully be co-installable. There are some exceptions, which we were not aware of yet.
Am Mittwoch, den 30.03.2011, 21:41 +0200 schrieb Ralf Treinen: Package: libghc-deepseq-doc,libghc6-deepseq-doc > Version: libghc-deepseq-doc/1.1.0.2-1 > Version: libghc6-deepseq-doc/1.1.0.0-2 > [..] > Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages > (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be > slightly out of sync): > > /usr/share/doc-base/haskell-deepseq-api > and Am Mittwoch, den 30.03.2011, 22:33 +0200 schrieb Ralf Treinen: > libghc6-text-doc and libghc-text-doc > files: > /usr/share/doc-base/haskell-text-ap have doc-base registration, which we actually do not want for Haskell libraries – they have their own index. We’ll remove the registration in libghc-deepseq-doc, this shoul take care of this. > libghc6-http-doc and libghc-http-doc > files: > /usr/share/doc/haskell-http-doc/html/* Is that 1:4000.1.1-2 or 40001010-1? The older had some left-over things in debian/rules that I removed in the newer and that should take care of of this. Same will apply to > libghc6-regex-compat-doc and libghc-regex-compat-doc > libghc6-zlib-doc and libghc-zlib-doc Unless someone is faster, I’ll look into that over the weekend. Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
