On 03-26 20:10, Jaap Karssenberg wrote: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Witold Baryluk > <bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl>wrote: > > > Package: zim > > Version: 0.50-1 > > Severity: critical > > Justification: causes serious data loss > > > > After setting up zim folder to some preexisting folder, > > I made a note, then delete it. All files in the folder momentally > > disapered. > > ALL. Whole directory just was deleted. > > > > First it should not delete user data! > > Second it should move them first to the Trash. > > > > I have no backup, as this was a files I was working today and yesterday. > > > > > I'm very sorry to hear you lost data unexpectedly, we work hard to prevent > that. In version 0.50 the "delete page" dialog gives a detailed list of > files that will be deleted when you continue. Did you see this dialogue? If > so should we make it more clear in some way?
Hmm. Indeed, i was using 0.48-1 from squeezy/stable. Sorry for wrong version in bug report. Will test it. Now trying to check backup and eventually will try undelete on this ext3 partition. Shouldn't zim detect which files was own files created in zim (using file extension or xattr, or something else), and delete only them? > I agree zim should use the Trash, there is an open bug report for that > here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/zim/+bug/297273 Well, good idea. How about using normal system trash? -- Witold Baryluk JID: witold.baryluk // jabster.pl
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
