On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 13:08, Rene Engelhard <r...@debian.org> wrote:

> tag 619263 + moreinfo
> tag 619263 + unreproducible
> thanks
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:58:23AM -0300, Ariel Barreiro wrote:
> > I am unable to run libreoffice at all with a normal user. This started to
> happen recently, I guess some updates. I am keeping my debian testeing
> up-to-date mostly on a weekly basis but I lost track on when it happened.
>
> OMG. Why do people wait until it's not trackable anymore?
>
> > This is the output I get:
> >
> > [Java framework] Error in function createSettingsDocument (elements.cxx).
> > javaldx failed!
> > terminate called after throwing an instance of
> 'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException'
> >
> > I am able to run it as root after doing xhost + though.
> >
> > I found references to a similar problem and mentioned different
> permissions issues on ~/.openoffice.org or ~/.openoffice.org2 or ~/.config
> but I have all those set properly.
>
> And .libreoffice? Of course libreoffice doesn't use .openoffice.org etc.
>

I don't have any .libreoffice, not sure if it should. I just thought it
might well use the old config on the name change.


>
> > I help would be appreciated, thanks.
>
> Eh? The BTS is not a support forum. And it's not a bug in LibO if your
> config
> permissions are wrong.
>

Sorry, didn't mean for support, but as far as I can tell, the permissions
looks just fine on my config, so just wondered. If this is not a bug, I
apologize then.


>
> > Versions of packages libreoffice suggests:
> > ii           1.4.6-1                         Common UNIX Printing
> System(tm) -
>
> And your system seems to be broken in other ways, too. no package names
> here?
>
> Needless to say: starts fine here (just tested yesterday).
>
> Grüße/Regards,
>
> René
> --
>  .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
>  : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
>  `. `'  r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70
>   `-   Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70
>

Reply via email to