Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:56:29 +0100
with message-id <87ipvctl0y.fsf...@hepworth.siccegge.de>
and subject line user error
has caused the Debian Bug report #619119,
regarding gnutls-bin: can't connect to IPv6 TLS host
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
619119: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619119
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gnutls-bin
Version: 2.10.5-1
Severity: serious
/---
% gnutls-cli -p 993 imap.freenet.de
Resolving 'imap.freenet.de'...
Connecting to '2001:748:100:40::8:110:993'...
Cannot connect to imap.freenet.de:993: Operation not permitted
\---
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: kFreeBSD 8.2-1-amd64
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages gnutls-bin depends on:
ii libc0.1 2.11.2-13 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii libgcrypt11 1.4.6-5 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr
ii libgnutls26 2.10.5-1 the GNU TLS library - runtime libr
ii libreadline6 6.1-3 GNU readline and history libraries
ii libtasn1-3 2.9-2 Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime)
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime
gnutls-bin recommends no packages.
gnutls-bin suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Missconfiguration not a bug, sorry for the noise
--
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
--- End Message ---
