Source: libvigraimpex
Version: 1.7.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-m...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: mips
$ grep -m1 'all 100 trees' *{mips,arm}*log | sort -t _ -k3
libvigraimpex_1.7.1+dfsg-1_armel.log:all 100 trees have been learned in 54688.1
msec
libvigraimpex_1.7.1+dfsg-3_armel.log:all 100 trees have been learned in 56391.8
msec
libvigraimpex_1.7.1+dfsg-2_armel.log:all 100 trees have been learned in 57515.8
msec
libvigraimpex_1.7.1+dfsg-3_mips.log:all 100 trees have been learned in
2.27253e+06 msec
libvigraimpex_1.7.1+dfsg-2_mips.log:all 100 trees have been learned in
2.28524e+06 msec
libvigraimpex_1.7.1+dfsg-1_mipsel.log:all 100 trees have been learned in
13943.6 msec
libvigraimpex_1.7.1+dfsg-3_mipsel.log:all 100 trees have been learned in
16365.9 msec
So it looks like for this particular test mips is ~40 times slower than
armel and ~150 times slower than mipsel.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
