On Do, 2011-03-03 at 12:25 +0000, David Bremner wrote: > On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:25:54 +0100, Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> > wrote: > > > > You are right, the libsynthesis-sdk.pc file needs to list libsmltk as > > library it depends upon. There's no libsmltk.pc at the moment. Creating > > one and listing it under "Requires" might be the cleanest solution, but > > perhaps adding -lsmltk to "Libs" in libsynthesis-sdk.pc is good enough? > > > > Hi Patrick; > > Do you mean synthesis.pc? synthesis-sdk.pc doesn't currently list > -lsynthesis (which in my shallow understanding was the point of having > two .pc files).
No, I mean libsynthesis-sdk. The undefined symbol is in libsynthesissdk_la-san.o, so libsynthesissdk.a must be linked explicitly against libsmltk (which is not the same as libsynthesis). -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
